Everything we do is counted. In public. Including what we have not done.
A live, public, party-agnostic record of what has been raised, what has been resolved, what is still open, and how long it took — state by state.
Choose a state to see what has been raised there, what has been settled, what is still waiting, and which offices are answering fastest.
We publish the states where we are doing badly on the same page as the states where we are doing well. No party. No politics. Just the numbers, and the method we used to get them.
Figures appear here, live, once the dashboard is connected to the case system and each number has been verified. We do not publish a number we cannot defend.
No verified figures are published for this state yet. When the dashboard is live, this page will show matters raised, resolved, open and overdue; the district and department breakdown; the resolution rate; the median and 90th-percentile days to resolve; and a 12-month trend. Open and overdue matters will carry the same visual weight as resolved ones.
What the dashboard publishes, and what each word means
| View | What it shows | Granularity |
|---|---|---|
| National map | Every state and union territory, shaded by resolution rate, with raised, resolved, open and overdue counts on hover | State |
| State page | District breakdown, department breakdown, category breakdown, resolution rate, median and 90th-percentile days to resolve, trend over 12 months | District, department |
| Women empowered | Women registered, in work, in training, entitlements claimed and their value, legal matters closed, enterprises started, card members — each with its own definition | State, district, month |
| Grievance categories | Entitlements and pensions · wages and employment · safety and police · legal and maintenance · health access · education and admissions · documentation · housing and ration · harassment and POSH | Category by state |
| What is still open | Given equal visual weight to what is resolved. Open, overdue, and cases closed without resolution, with the reason | All levels |
| Raw data | Full anonymised dataset as CSV and a documented open API, updated on the same schedule as the dashboard | — |
Definitions
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| Grievance raised | A matter registered with the Forum on behalf of a named member, with a reference number and a responsible public office identified. Advice given without a filing is not a grievance. |
| Resolved | The outcome the member sought was obtained, and the member has confirmed it. An office marking a file closed is not resolution. |
| Closed without resolution | Rejected, withdrawn, lost contact, or superseded — published separately with the reason, never folded into “resolved”. |
| Overdue | Open beyond the statutory or published service-delivery timeline for that category in that state. |
| Women empowered | We do not publish a single “empowered” number. We publish only its components — registered, in work, in training, entitlement claimed, matter closed, enterprise started — each defined, each countable, each verifiable. |
| Days to resolve | Calendar days from filing to member-confirmed resolution. We publish the median and the 90th percentile, never the mean, which one long case distorts. |
Which offices answer fastest — and how we measure it fairly
District Collectorates, Departments of Women & Child Development, District Legal Services Authorities, District Police, Labour Commissionerates. Offices persist; office-holders change. No politician's name, photograph, party or symbol appears anywhere on this dashboard.
Only matters the Forum itself filed, tracked and had confirmed by the member. We make no inference about any office's overall performance.
No office is ranked on fewer than 30 closed matters in the window. Below that, we show the count and mark it “too few matters to rank”.
We compare by category mix and caseload, and publish the normalisation method.
Every ranked office may submit a written response, published unedited beside its figures, and may contest any record through a documented correction process with a published log of corrections.
We lead with “Fastest responding offices this quarter” and publish the full table, including the slow end.
Identical method, thresholds and schedule in every state, whoever governs it. The method is fixed and published before the data is, and never adjusted after the results are seen.
We freeze all new comparative rankings from the announcement of the model code of conduct until results are declared. The underlying data stays live.
Download it. Embed it. Check it.
No login. No email capture.
The dashboard, the CSV and the API are open to anyone — governments, researchers, newsrooms.
Embeddable and adoptable
Built to GIGW 3.0 and MDDS so a State Government can adopt or embed it without a second assessment. Accessible to WCAG 2.1 AA, in all four languages.
Privacy first
No name, photograph, address, case narrative or combination of fields from which a woman could be identified appears here. Small cells are suppressed. Safety, trafficking, POSH, counselling, health and matrimonial matters are counted but never broken down below state level.
No manual edits
No figure may be edited by hand. Every number derives from the case system; a correction is made in the source record with a logged reason, never on the dashboard.
Updated near real time
Counts update near real time; rankings are recomputed monthly on a published date. Every page carries its last-updated time.
Audited every year
An annual third-party audit of the dashboard's figures against the underlying records, published in full including any discrepancy found.
Downloads and the API go live with the dashboard.